<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Best Stock Photo of 2007 is&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stockvault.net/blog/contests/the-best-stock-photo-of-2007-is/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stockvault.net/blog/contests/the-best-stock-photo-of-2007-is</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bjorgvin Gudmundsson</title>
		<link>http://www.stockvault.net/blog/contests/the-best-stock-photo-of-2007-is#comment-57859</link>
		<dc:creator>Bjorgvin Gudmundsson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockvault.net/blog/contests/the-best-stock-photo-of-2007-is#comment-57859</guid>
		<description>If you took the time to read the interview I linked to above, you'd see that Bob does not manipulate his images.

And I would also like to add that a "stock" photo can surely be altered, manipulated, staged and whatnot.

Here's a link to Wikipedia's definition of "stock photo": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stock_photo

The term "stock photo" has nothing to do with how the images are composed. It's rather a statement of usability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you took the time to read the interview I linked to above, you&#8217;d see that Bob does not manipulate his images.</p>
<p>And I would also like to add that a &#8220;stock&#8221; photo can surely be altered, manipulated, staged and whatnot.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a link to Wikipedia&#8217;s definition of &#8220;stock photo&#8221;: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stock_photo" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stock_photo</a></p>
<p>The term &#8220;stock photo&#8221; has nothing to do with how the images are composed. It&#8217;s rather a statement of usability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yves</title>
		<link>http://www.stockvault.net/blog/contests/the-best-stock-photo-of-2007-is#comment-57858</link>
		<dc:creator>yves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockvault.net/blog/contests/the-best-stock-photo-of-2007-is#comment-57858</guid>
		<description>My point is,,,
staged pics is kind of like, Milli Vanilli,,,
It's cheating !

STOCK = AS IS / NOT ALTERED /</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My point is,,,<br />
staged pics is kind of like, Milli Vanilli,,,<br />
It&#8217;s cheating !</p>
<p>STOCK = AS IS / NOT ALTERED /</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bjorgvin Gudmundsson</title>
		<link>http://www.stockvault.net/blog/contests/the-best-stock-photo-of-2007-is#comment-57843</link>
		<dc:creator>Bjorgvin Gudmundsson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockvault.net/blog/contests/the-best-stock-photo-of-2007-is#comment-57843</guid>
		<description>Yes it is called stockvault. A stock photo can be staged, there's nothing wrong with that. What exactly is your point?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes it is called stockvault. A stock photo can be staged, there&#8217;s nothing wrong with that. What exactly is your point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yves</title>
		<link>http://www.stockvault.net/blog/contests/the-best-stock-photo-of-2007-is#comment-57825</link>
		<dc:creator>yves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 03:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockvault.net/blog/contests/the-best-stock-photo-of-2007-is#comment-57825</guid>
		<description>ONE MORE TRY !
Is this site not called,,, " STOCK " vault ?!?
Bob's pic looks " staged " to me ?!?!?

please explain !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ONE MORE TRY !<br />
Is this site not called,,, &#8221; STOCK &#8221; vault ?!?<br />
Bob&#8217;s pic looks &#8221; staged &#8221; to me ?!?!?</p>
<p>please explain !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joy sheppard</title>
		<link>http://www.stockvault.net/blog/contests/the-best-stock-photo-of-2007-is#comment-57652</link>
		<dc:creator>joy sheppard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 09:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockvault.net/blog/contests/the-best-stock-photo-of-2007-is#comment-57652</guid>
		<description>Thanks a  bunch for the info....Will check it out now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a  bunch for the info&#8230;.Will check it out now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bjorgvin Gudmundsson</title>
		<link>http://www.stockvault.net/blog/contests/the-best-stock-photo-of-2007-is#comment-57615</link>
		<dc:creator>Bjorgvin Gudmundsson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockvault.net/blog/contests/the-best-stock-photo-of-2007-is#comment-57615</guid>
		<description>I dug up this old interview with Bob where he explains his methods of shooting bugs and critters. http://www.apogeephoto.com/jan2003/bgaras.shtml</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dug up this old interview with Bob where he explains his methods of shooting bugs and critters. <a href="http://www.apogeephoto.com/jan2003/bgaras.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.apogeephoto.com/jan2003/bgaras.shtml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joy sheppard</title>
		<link>http://www.stockvault.net/blog/contests/the-best-stock-photo-of-2007-is#comment-57611</link>
		<dc:creator>joy sheppard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockvault.net/blog/contests/the-best-stock-photo-of-2007-is#comment-57611</guid>
		<description>Your photo is FANTASTIC!!  The subtitle made it even better!  Great shot.  How did you do that?  Do you have a pet tree frog?  Again, I loved the photo....it definitely is the winner.  bye now, joy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your photo is FANTASTIC!!  The subtitle made it even better!  Great shot.  How did you do that?  Do you have a pet tree frog?  Again, I loved the photo&#8230;.it definitely is the winner.  bye now, joy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bjorgvin Gudmundsson</title>
		<link>http://www.stockvault.net/blog/contests/the-best-stock-photo-of-2007-is#comment-57495</link>
		<dc:creator>Bjorgvin Gudmundsson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockvault.net/blog/contests/the-best-stock-photo-of-2007-is#comment-57495</guid>
		<description>You're welcome Bob. The prize money is on it's way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re welcome Bob. The prize money is on it&#8217;s way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob garas</title>
		<link>http://www.stockvault.net/blog/contests/the-best-stock-photo-of-2007-is#comment-57494</link>
		<dc:creator>bob garas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockvault.net/blog/contests/the-best-stock-photo-of-2007-is#comment-57494</guid>
		<description>thanks so much. i didnt realy think i had a chance amounst the wonderful image i have seen here

thank you

bob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks so much. i didnt realy think i had a chance amounst the wonderful image i have seen here</p>
<p>thank you</p>
<p>bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
